Wednesday, 2 July 2025

Structured Literacy - COP Session 1 Phonogical Awareness and Alphabetic Principle

 Interestingly the module paperwork says year 0-3. I am in a Year 5/6 class.

Review from the previous 3 days. Diagnostic findings direct the teaching of necessary knowledge; Tiered Instruction ensures that all students receive the learning they need. We need to consider the components and delivery of the literacy block; Classroom environment/setup to best support teaching and learning.

Aspects of previous days was covered around assessment and how it directs teaching and learning.FLSA needed to be done for students at risk - Tier 3 students who specifically need phonemic awareness, their knowledge gaps and to determine where to start teaching.

The Stages of Ability - multisensory - finger spell, clapping, segmentation of sound; initial, final and medial, knowledge, automatic and transference - corrct sound to symbol knowledge. We need to be responsive to students' needs.

Monitoring required at least every 10 weeks with PA.

Spelling assessments could the The Code or iDeaL We used iDeal. iDeal gives us the group reports.

We need to teach at curriculum level. Frontload at lower stage. Provide different words/sentences.and with prompts and visual aids.



Key Considerations for Great Pracice
  • print the lesson plan and follow
  • teach all 4 lessons
  • 20 min max at a perky pace
  • Decode, Encode, Decode every time
  • Dictation
  • Video yourself to improve your own implementation
This was followed up by the statement of : How we teach matters and reiteration of knowing the teaching sequence, practise yourself with a lesson, use high leverage teaching practises and active participation and opportunities to respond. We only have to be one concept ahead of students to pre-learn the next the week before.

Lastly was dictation tips to support students and teaching of irregular words and the de-impletation of essential words.

I found this to be a full on session and at times confusing as things seemed to change with having different people taking the PD.  Maybe it was my own cognitive overload.  Having this time to reread and type into here is helping me to remember and give me ideas for moving forward as I plan T3.

Structured Literacy

In Term 2, I began the Structured Literacy training. I had 3 full days and 2 community of practise days. I have decided to blog these to help me reinforce my understanding of the tasks and what Structured Literacy is about.

Day 1.  The Literate Brain 

The Science of Reading is about how we learn to retain and quickly retrieve information in this context. Starting with Cognitive Psychology which is the best method of delivery, Neuro-Science - what is happening in the brain, Linquistics - the scope and sequence of the English language code, and for us teachers; the components of the language and the order to teach from simple to complex and lastly, Education - classroom delivery.

The left hemisphere is the language processing centre of the brain.  A reading network must be developed for skilled reading to happen.  Reading Comprehension needs word level decoding skills and language comprehension. Phonemic awareness is one of the biggest factors for literacy success. The brain processes at sound level, not word level. 

The Reading Brain has 4 areas, - the Broca - phonological awareness, Angular Gyrus - sound to symbol, Wernickes - comprehension and Visual Word Form Area (letterbox) - orthographic mapping. The retrieval from the Letterbox needs to be effortless. You can't write, what you can't retrieve.

Sounding - DECODE, ENCODE, DECODE.   I do, we do, you do.

Orthographic Mapping - retrieval when reading 

  • Semantic (vocab knowledge) - understanding it
  • Orthographic lexicon - sound to symbol skills - spell it
  • Phonological Lexicon - phonemic awareness - hear it
  • Orthographically mapped to letterbox.
1-4 exposures to the word or sound to retain ( or up to 1500 for dyslexic students)

The Simple View of Reading
D X LC = RC.  decoding/word recognition x language com/listening comp = reading comprehension/print

Scarborough's Reading Rope
Language comprehension woven with word recognition - Both aspects to be explicitly taught
Language comprehension - background knoweldge, vocab, language structure, verbal reasoning, literacy knowledge
Word recognition - phonological awareness, decoding, sight recognition.

The Science of Learning
Explicit instruction, stages of learning, working memory and the forgetting curve, spaced retrieval practice, cognitive load theory.
We need to reduce the forgetting curve, learning is really hard, and we struggle to learn with cognitive overload.

Explicit instruction - explain, demonstrate and model everything. I do, we do, you do.  Give opportunities to practice. Include daily reviews so it become automatic, We have to keep thinking about something to remember.  There is a need for active participation from the students. Rehearse, retrieve, practise for learning.   Knowledge matters!!

Spaced and Retrieval Practice
Review new content regularly - spaced repetition is the best. Vary the order of practise. Retrieval after delay makes memories stronger and more flexible.

Cognitive Load Theory - to not overload the students' with learning.
To help - use clean slides, give time to read/locck, obtainable chunks, check for understanding, use books or mini whiteboards, be interactive -7-9 interactions in 1 minute.  

Structured Literacy
Be multimodal, - listening, speaking reading and writing encode-decode-encode. 

Principles - diagnostic, systematic instruction, cumulative - step by step instruction to build on concepts already (previously) learnt, explicit, intention and multimodal instruction.

13 Elements of Explicit Instruction which can be used for all curriculum areas. 

Content 1. Critical Content 2. Broken down into obtainable chunks.

Design 3. Organised and focused. 4. Lesson Goals 5. Review (talk with a buddy) 6. I Do, 7. We Do, 8. You do.

Delivery 9. Frequent responses from students 10. Monitor, 11. Provide Feedback 12. Perky Pace

Praciice 13. Judicious practice - deliberate practice, retrieval practice included, spaced and cumulating.


All this explicit instruction leads towards gradual release of responsibility from the teacher to the students.

This was a very full day of theory. It makes sense as it is a very scaffolded way learning for students. 

Day 2 - 3 Areas

1. Oral Language and Language Processing

Oral language comes first, followed by formal literacy acquisition with code based instruction in phonemic awareness and alphabetic principles knowledge which leads on to encoding and decoding.

Receptive Language is listening and reading, Expressive Language is speaking and writing.

The importance of oral language and knowing vocabulary impacts literacy acquisition. I see this with my students especially those who are ESOL.  This section of the day was very junior based in some aspects. 

A suggested activity is read alouds to develop oral language. 1.  to read a story, and ask questions, ensuring wait time for thinking, sharing with a buddy and checking. 2 at a higher year level, to be given 4 key words and students to read out the words, and then read with teacher the words of the text to find the word, add suffix or change tense.  

Language Processing - Phonological, Orthographic, Morphological, Semantic, Syntactic, Discourse/Pragmatics

Phonological and Phonemic Awareness - to manipulate souns, and to identify sounds into their individual units.  The Ideal Platform has the scope and sequence to follow for levels 1,2,3.

Orthographic Process - ie grapheme ch can have 3 phonemes /ch/, /k/, /sh/. lunch, school, machine. No wonder English is tricky. The phoneme /ā/ (long a) has 8 graphemes.

Morphological Processing - adding suffixes, and prefixes and changing the verb tenses. How does changing the morphemes contribute to our understanding of  the words? My answer would be to use them correctly in a sentence either spoken or written and to understand when something happens in time.

Semantics - the meaning of words. Teaching synonyms and antonyms to improve vocabulary and so we are more expressive. This also includes grammar rules and the purpose and and function of a sentence.

Pragmatics and Discourse - use language in context - How does our language change ie in formal and informal setting whether spoken or written.

There are screening tools like Hegarty for Oral Language and support. We need to look for indicators of weak oral language.

2. Phonological Awareness - the ability to hear, perceive, isolate and manipulate the smallest units of spoken sound. The foundation of literacy. This includes rhyme, alliteration and syllable level and occurs away from print.

Phonemic awareness (subset of Phonological awareness) needs auditory discrimination of sounds, phoneme isolating, blending and manipulating and onset & rime of deleting and substituting.

Syllable blending, Seqgmenting and Deletion is important as it helps with decoding reading and a strategy when spelling. It was stated it must be automatic and effortless. 

Rhyming is needs to transfer known spelling patterns. Initial sound awareness is the first step in identify all sounds and without this, automaticity doesn't happen. Blending is to blend the sounds to make a word. Multimodel - speaking, fingers for sound, and hearing to help learn. If sounds cannot be isolated, then encoding is incorrect. Phoneme manipulation is to change sounds within spoken words ie cat -cut. Encoding of words is again incorrect when the sound change is not noticed.

Syllable Types - This was interesting as I was unable to list them. I recognised them when shown.

There are 7 syllable types and are taught at every stage with higher levels of difficulty or sophistication.

The recommendations for great practise are to keep lessons to a maximum of 20 minutes and a perky pace, use decode, encode and decode, dictation supports learning, and view the videos in Ideal for instruction.

Day 3. Assessment and Types. Setting up the Environment and Literacy Block.

Assessment should always answer a question about the student, inform class instruction, and should be done quickly and efficiently. There are 4 types of assessment - screening, diagnostic, progress monitoring and outcome. All assessments must be valid and reliable. Screen tools in particular must be quick and prior to instruction and will identify at risk students. Use diagnostic strengths and weakness to determine what should I do next for this student. Progress monitoring is quick check ins and assess the skill that has been just taught.

There are 6 assessments in Ideal - FLSA - foundation literacy skills assessment, PAST - phonolgoical awareness screening test, ORF - oral reading fluency, DIBELS - dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills, IRSR IDeaL Reading Skills Record and NWF - Nonsense-word fluency.

FLSA (relevant for Tier 2/3 intervention)is recommended for Year 4+ at risk students for phonological awareness and letter sound check. iDeaL spelling for Year 4 and up. DIBELS and IRSR also for Year 4 -8 

I did the spelling assessment on the class so I could begin Term 3 from the correct start. I tested my students who didn't pass the Stage Two and then tested them on Stage 1. This I wasn't supposed to do but I think by inputing the information after I make them zero on Stage 2, I will get some targeted group instruction as they are outliers/different class. Stage 1 is considered to be inappropriate for older students, however, if they are missing this they need it). 

One of the best pieces of advice given was to teach the spelling over 2 weeks. 1 week the lower level and the second week the higher level. Differentiate with home learning and independent activities.

An important statement - differentiation does not mean grouping

DIBELS  - This assessment is for reading fluency and its importance was covered on Day 1. We then had to test our students on this and input into iDeaL for the MOE. Those under 50 percentile are at risk. It was interesting to do and sort of matched what I knew about my students.

Other assessments covered briefly as they are covered in full on COP days.

Literacy Block

Recommendations to start with spelling as it helps reading. Potential timings given. Handwriting also covered as when automatic there is more space in working memory to focus on spelling etc.


Reading and writing was briefly talked about and mostly left for COP sessions.

There is much to think about and to become familiar with starting with assessment so I know where to start. I have always taught phonological knowledge but not always to the depth that has been explained. It is great that the lessons are on iDeal to help us through and not reinvent the wheel.





Saturday, 14 December 2024

Multi Modal Learning

My second inquiry on Multi Modal Learning came from my DFI course at the beginning of the year. I have to admit I have struggled with this.  When I look back I'm not really sure I understood multi modal learning when on DFI, and decided to add audio to some  slides using Mote. This worked well until Mote said I needed to pay. 

If I could use a story from the Ready to Read with an audio I added that. In Term 2, I added Mote to a slide deck I made in Diffit for Matariki. Also in Term 2, we were looking at information reports in Writing so these were added to help my students find information.


I added Motes to these instructions for Writing Correct sentences.

Since teaching more digitally I have always used videos to help teach and reienfore a point especially in maths. I find someone else's voice often works better than mine.  Up until I was shown the Pillars of Practice for teaching reading in Term 3, I started to understand better.  My team leader, shared multimodal text selection slide and talked me through the multiple texts which really helped me focus when I made my multi-modal text. 





I created a guided reading plan with the help of my team leader using an article from the internet, a video and a written text around myths on the sun and the actual science.  I think my students have enjoyed using the different texts to link back to the focussing questions. I'm looking forward to creating more of these texts to help empower my students.





Multi- Modal Learning - research

 

Empowering English as an Additional Language students through digital multimodal composing

Melissa Barnes, Ekaterina Tour

First published: 23 April 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12319Citations: 2


https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/lit.12319


I chose this research article because it is about students for who English is a second language and this pertains to several of my students and “many come from disadvantaged backgrounds. Humanitarian entrants are usually from low socio-economic and educational backgrounds due to past histories and circumstances. “


They explained multimodal as “The New London Group (1996) identified five different modes of meaning-making: linguistic, visual, audio, gestural and spatial. When texts involve two or more modes, they are called ‘multimodal’ (Elola & Oskoz, 2017; “


The text continues on to say that students are empowered and given voice as students are interacting with different viewpoints and this can change their own viewpoint which then leads to change in their own behaviours. Multi-modal texts also allow for students to engage in discussion. 


The research focuses on the choices given in the multi-modal activities  in this case, lead to social justice but found that “research exploring digital multimodal composing from a critical literacy perspective is scarce.”  Also, the students were given the means to develop their own multimodal texts.


This paragraph containing the results is especially interesting when it talks about their home language, the value in the development of skills and that the reflection of interest and identities supported critical literacies.

“First, it was found that both the students and pre-service teachers valued the development of skills, knowledge and understandings associated with digital multimodal composing and its transferability to the everyday classroom, particularly given the students' limited previous exposure. Second, students enjoyed creative and free experimentation with a range of multimodal and multilingual resources to create digital texts reflecting their interests and identities, which, in turn, supported critical literacies. Finally, the students were positioned as knowledgeable and active meaning-makers through strategic scaffolding by the pre-service teachers and peer interaction in home language in the process of digital multimodal composing.”


The students liked how they could change the power dynamics of a classroom as being students who could help others. I see this in my class with students who are willing to assist others.


This reading has given me the understanding that multi-modal texts empower students especially when they have the choice in their follow-up activity and how the scaffolding is so important. It was a very interesting article that has given me food for thought.


Saturday, 30 November 2024

Teaching as Inquiry - The Code - Timepoint 3


G1 student is showing excellent progress with The Code in areas we have covered.
B1 student is similar but can be careless when attitude is shown to testing.  
These two students were in the main class group. 

The remaining students all worked with the teacher aide on heart words which is where there is improvement in the heart words (words not following spelling patterns) but the word check for the year levels wasn't done.

B3 student with spelling has made some improvement but not as much as the other on heart words. This student is now on an IEP as I grew concerned with a lack of progress in all areas. 
The other students on heart words have done very well. They still have a way to go on the list words for the year levels.  Bar G2 more awareness of spelling correctly is demonstrated in their writing.




The E-asttle results show progress within their writing except for two students who use a range of everyday words that does not necessarily show spelling improvement. Choosing a wider range of vocabulary helped along with more awareness of spelling. As the testing is done on computer, there is an element of spell check as seeing words that are underlined to be fixed is encouraged.

Overall, I am pleased with the results for both The Code and E-asttle which shows that a regular focus and routine of teaching spelling does work. 

From my backwards mappings:

Measurable Outcome


  • Shift in written spelling outcomes in work and tests. TP 1 and 2 literacy data

  • PAT/Probe/Running Record/E-asttle, The Code Spelling

  • Using tracking sheet for The Code

  • Shift in spelling and vocabulary in e-asttle

  • Increased volume of content in class and formal testing

  • Shifts in vocab and spelling in E-asttle and via the Tracking Sheet -The Code


  • There has been a shift in written spelling outcomes in work and tests. Volume output in writing has increased when not hampered by working out spelling.
  • I noticed with students while doing the running records (all t/aide group) that they are reading words really well and are working out unknown ones within the scope of their knowledge.
  • The use of the tracking sheet allowed me to target words to build a solid base for spelling.
  • Shifts can clearly be seen in most cases.

What does this look like?

  • Students to approach new and challenging words with confidence

  • Apply sound knowledge in reading and writing when faced with new or challenging words

  • Have a wider vocabulary to draw upon.

  • Make connections between spelling patterns

  • Shift in spelling and vocabulary in e-asttle

  • Applying the new learning in context at speed


  • I can see more confidence in their spelling when writing. I think that new and challenging words is still a work in progress.
  • I can see the sound knowledge in their working out and it is easier to recognise in context except for a capital I. Lower case I's still regularly appear in writing but not in tests.
  • To see a wider vocabulary with The Code, I think I need to make links for my students when we see these in shared and guided texts. Possibly as we had not reached a level where a wider vocabulary is shown as the Year 5's have not done their level of The Code.
  • The evidence shows the shifts with the regular testing and ensuring the gaps were filled for that solid base.
  • Many of the students in the group are still to work at speed.
For me if we continue:
  • I would like to see the RTLB in action with The Code so I can be more speedy. I did want to approach her to come in but ran out of time due to other things happening.
  • To build on my own spelling knowledge as I can spell without knowing the why. For example the other day I did the camel rule which I had never even heard of. It's about syllable division - When one consonant comes between two vowels divide before the second vowel. - ie cam.el or com.ic.
  • Get the students who are still working at Year 1 and are 4/5 years behind more confident and accurate, along with being able to write and think at a higher speed.












 

2024 Teaching as Inquiry - The Code - Timepoint 2

 At the end of Term 2, I retested my students. 


As you can see from the date at the end of Year 2 progress has been made especially in the area of heart words ( those that don't follow spelling rules). 







G1 and B1 students are in the main group. The rest are working with t/aide on heart words as they were so poor  at heart words  and needed handwriting on lines as they were not forming their letters correctly and not to size and shape either. 

From the overall results, I was able to work out for the next term, the gaps to be filled by revisiting as I wanted the my Year 4/5 students to be solid at Years 1-3.



Monday, 12 August 2024

2024 Teaching as Inquiry - The Code

As Structured Literacy progresses through the levels of schooling nationally, our school took on The Code - A systematic approach for teaching spelling. We were given some training which was helpful. I tested my students. As I have a Year 4/5 class, I decided to test all my students from The Code - Year 2 up. We were to start two years below their year level and to make life easier, I did everyone on the same levels. We had been given a tracking sheet which clearly showed up the gaps.
Blanks are those students who were away. Pink zeros are the gaps.  This was further analysed into 2 distinct groups. Those that had some catch up to do with Year 2 and 3 spelling, and a smaller group who needed to start back with Year 1. It was noticeable with the bigger group that there was generally several students with the same gaps. An example would be the silent e/VCe syllable. The two vowels together represent the long vowel u_e, i_e, a_e, e_e.  This would have been Year 2 learning ordinarily, however, my Y5's would have been in Year 2 when Covid lockdowns began. 

I based my starting point on a FB post of Liz Kane's.



I began teaching the bigger group at 9am in the morning whilst the smaller group did SSR and Stepsweb. I then took them at 11 am while the bigger group did SSR and Stepsweb. 

I set up some slides similar to examples we had been given and following the teacher text in the back of the book.  The bigger group I started  




I then had some PD by watching RA (my team leader in action) with my class.
For quite some time, I slavishly followed RA's sequence to get the routine in. I was able to come away from this as I grew more confident and adapted depending on the lesson as some are easier and less involved as others.

I noticed with some students who had scraped into the bigger teaching group were going "Oh, I get it."  With one student I asked if The Code was helping her and I got a big smile which was a real positive for The Code and me.

I have chosen 6 students across both groups for my Timepoint Data 1.




The heart is what Liz Kane calls Heart Words. Those words that do not follow the spelling rules. E.G.: was, all, he, she, my and the  - to list a few.  These I called Tricky Words when I taught Jolly Phonics several years before.


My Backwards Map - to show my journey